Students’ Problem‑Solving Skills and Gender‑Based Comparison in Thermodynamics through the STEM Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19184/se.v8i1.53723Keywords:
problem solving skills, thermodynamics, STEM Approach, Gender comparisonAbstract
Problem-solving skills through the STEM approach are currently also being examined in relation to gender differences. This study aims to describe students’ problem-solving skills and compare them based on gender in the topic of thermodynamics using the STEM approach. The research employed a descriptive quantitative method involving 86 grade 11 science students, consisting of 51 female and 35 male students. The problem-solving indicators used include Useful Description, Physics Approach, Specific Application of Physics, Mathematical Procedure, and Logical Progression. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparative tests. The results showed that, in general, students’ problem-solving abilities were in the “good” category. The comparative analysis revealed that female students outperformed male students in the Useful Description and Logical Progression indicators, while male students showed higher performance in Specific Application of Physics and Mathematical Procedure. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the Physics Approach indicator. Overall, the total score of students’ problem-solving skills indicated no significant difference between female and male students. These findings suggest that the STEM approach fosters equitable opportunities for both genders to develop physics problem-solving skills, despite differences in specific indicator strengths. Therefore, STEM-based learning should be designed contextually and inclusively to accommodate students’ diverse potentials and cognitive styles in a balanced manner.
Downloads
References
Armando, M., Ochs, M., & Régner, I. (2022). The Impact of Pedagogical Agents’ Gender on Academic Learning: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5(June), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.862997
Arroyo, I., Burleson, W., Tai, M., Muldner, K., & Woolf, B. P. (2013). Gender differences in the use and benefit of advanced learning technologies for mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032748
Aziz, M. S., Zain, A. N. M., Samsudin, M. A. Bin, & Saleh, S. B. (2014). The impact of PBL on Undergraduate Physics Students’ Understanding of Thermodynamics. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarems/v3-i4/1088
Bain, K., Moon, A., Mack, M. R., & Towns, M. H. (2014). Research and Practice of thermodynamics at the university level. 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00011k
Balta, N., & Asikainen, M. A. (2019). Introductory students’ attitudes and approaches to physics problem solving: Major, achievement level and gender differences. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.666
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
Brown, B., & Singh, C. (2022). Student understanding of thermodynamic processes, variables and systems. European Journal of Physics, 43(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ac7af2
Budiyono. (2015). Statistika untuk Penelitian. UNS Press.
Christensen, W. M., Meltzer, D. E., & Ogilvie, C. A. (2009). Student ideas regarding entropy and the second law of thermodynamics in an introductory physics course. American Journal of Physics, 77(10), 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3167357
Collins, R. (2014). Skills for the 21st Century: teaching higher-order thinking. Curriculum & Leadership Journal, 12 (14). Curriculum & Leadership Journal, 12(14), 31.
Daniel, E. (2016). The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91–100. https://doi.org/2222-288X
Ding, N., & Harskamp, E. (2006). How partner gender influences female students’ problem solving in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5–6), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9021-7
Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., Mason, A., Ryan, Q. X., & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020106
English, L. D. (2023). Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1219–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7
Foroushani, S. (2019). Misconceptions in engineering thermodynamics: A review. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 47(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419018754396
Ganley, C. M., & Lubienski, S. T. (2016). Mathematics confidence, interest, and performance: Examining gender patterns and reciprocal relations. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.002
Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2022). The Effects of Integrated STEM Education Practices on Problem Solving Skills, Scientific Creativity, and Critical Thinking Dispositions. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.143.9.6
Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2010). Cooperative Problem Solving in Physics A User’s Manual Why? What? How? Recognize the Problem What’s going on? STEP 1.
Istiyono, E., Mustakim, S. S., Widihastuti, Suranto, & Mukti, T. S. (2019). Measurement of physics problem-solving skills in female and male students by phystepross. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.17640
Jewaru, A. A. L., Parno, P., Nasikhudin, N., Kusairi, S., & Latifah, E. (2022). The profile of students’ science process skill on thermodynamics topic through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings.
Jewaru, A. A. L., Parno, P., Nasikhudin, N., Kusairi, S., & Latifah, E. (2023). Exploration of students’ scientific argumentation ability on thermodynamics through authentic PBL with STEM approach and formative assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012081
Khan, M., Abid Siddiqui, M., & Malone, K. L. (2022). Scientific attitudes: gender differences, impact on physics scores and choices to study physics at higher levels among pre-college STEM students. International Journal of Science Education, 44(11), 1816–1839.
Liana, Y. R., Linuwih, S., & Sulhadi, S. (2020). The Development of Thermodynamics Law Experiment Media Based on IoT: Laboratory Activities Through Science Problem Solving for Gifted Young Scientists. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.06106
M. Vijaya, B. R., & Buncha, P. (2017). Students Problem-Solving Difficulties and Implications in Physics: An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14), 59–62. www.iiste.org
Meltzer, D. (2008). Investigating and addressing learning difficulties in thermodynamics. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--3900
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
Meltzer, D. E. (2004). Investigation of students’ reasoning regarding heat, work, and the first law of thermodynamics in an introductory calculus-based general physics course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1789161
Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C. R., & Nelson, C. (2015). A Model of Factors Contributing to STEM Learning and Career Orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863
Priemer, B., Eilerts, K., Filler, A., Pinkwart, N., Rösken-Winter, B., Tiemann, R., & Zu Belzen, A. U. (2020). A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1600490
Qotrunnada, N. A. (2022). Analysis of the Difficulties of High School Students in Improving Problem Solving Ability in Physics Learning. International Journal of Current Educational Research, 1(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.53621/ijocer.v1i1.141
Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The effectiveness of stem-based on gender differences: The impact of physics concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753
Samsudin, M. A., Zain, A. N., Jamali, S. M., Samsudin, M. A., Zain, A. N., Jamali, S. M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2019). Physics Achievement in STEM PjBL : A Gender Study To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-02105683 Physics Achievement in STEM PjBL : A Gender Study.
Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). Gender differences in science: An expertise perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9067-y
Tan, A. L., Ong, Y. S., Ng, Y. S., & Tan, J. H. J. (2023). STEM Problem Solving: Inquiry, Concepts, and Reasoning. Science & Education, 32(2), 381–397.
Tatar, E., & Oktay, M. (2011). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on teaching the first law of thermodynamics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 29(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2011.599318
Turns, S. R., & Van Meter, P. N. (2011). Applying knowledge from educational psychology and cognitive science to a first course in thermodynamics. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--17500
Wider, C., & Wider, W. (2023). Effects of Metacognitive Skills on Physics Problem-Solving Skills Among Form Four Secondary School Students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(2), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.257
