INTEGRASI STEM DAN HOTS DALAM PEMBELAJARAN SAINS: PERSPEKTIF GURU DALAM UPAYA PENINGKATAN SELF EFFICACY
Keywords:
higher order thinking skills, teacher innovation, science learning, self-efficacy, STEM educationAbstract
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach integrated with High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) has been recognized as an innovative method in enhancing 21st century skills, including critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration. This study aims to explore science teachers' perceptions of STEM-HOTS implementation and its impact on improving students' self-efficacy in senior high schools in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. This qualitative research used a survey method with semi-structured interviews with 13 science teachers from various public schools. The results showed that 77% of the teachers understood the concept of STEM, but none of them applied it in learning. The teachers realized the benefits of STEM in improving students' skills, but faced constraints such as lack of training, facilities and interdisciplinary collaboration. Nonetheless, teachers showed enthusiasm to implement this approach in the future. This study highlights the importance of continuous professional training, provision of resources and policy support to integrate STEM-HOTS in learning. The results of this study make an important contribution to the development of relevant learning strategies to improve the quality of education in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
REFERENSI
Almuharomah, F. A., Mayasari, T., & Kurniadi, E. (2019). Pengembangan Modul Fisika STEM Terintegrasi Kearifan Lokal “Beduk” untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v7i1.5630
Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2018). Foundations of multiliteracies: Reading, writing and talking in the 21st century. Routledge.
Apandi, I. (2018). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif Abad 21 dan HOTS. Samudra Biru.
Arifin, N. (2018). Upaya Meningkatkan Self-Efficacy Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendas Mahakam, 3(3), 255–266. https://jurnal.fkip-uwgm.ac.id/index.php/pendasmahakam/article/view/293/182
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka cipta.
Bozkurt Altan, E., & Ercan, S. (2016). STEM education program for science teachers: Perceptions and competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Specialissue), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10174a
Brand, B. R. (2020). Integrating science and engineering practices: outcomes from a collaborative professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00210-x
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z
Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M., & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of stem disciplines, real-world problems, 21st century skills, and stem careers within science teachers’ conceptions of integrated stem education. Education Sciences, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110737
Diana, N., & Turmudi, T. (2021). Kesiapan Guru dalam Mengembangkan Modul Berbasis STEM untuk Mendukung Pembelajaran di Abad 21. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(02), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.11720
English, L. D. (2015). Stem: Challenges and Opportunities for Mathematics Education. Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4–18.
Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122
Geng, J., Jong, M. S. Y., & Chai, C. S. (2019). Hong Kong Teachers’ Self-efficacy and Concerns About STEM Education. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0414-1
Ghofur, A., & Rachma, E. A. (2021). Persepsi Guru IPA Terhadap Pembelajaran STEM. SPEKTRA : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 2(2), 56–65.
Ghufron, M. N., & Risnawati, R. (2012). Teori-Teori Psikologi Cetakan III. In Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz media.
Grahito Wicaksono, A. (2020). Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Pendekatan Stem Dalam Menyongsong Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i1.98
Gupta, R., LaMarca, N., Rank, S. J., & Flinner, K. (2018). The Environment as a Pathway to Science Learning for K-12 Learners-A Case Study of the E-STEM Movement. Ecopsychology, 10(4), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0047
Ha, V. T., Chung, L. H., Hanh, N. V, & Hai, B. M. (2023). Teaching Science Using Argumentation-Supported 5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and Conventional Didactic Methods: Differences in the Learning Outcomes of Middle School …. Education Sciences. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/3/247
Hamad, S., Tairab, H., Wardat, Y., Rabbani, L., Alarabi, K., Yousif, M., Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Stoica, G. (2022). Understanding Science Teachers’ Implementations of Integrated STEM: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063594
Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018
Hussin, H., Jiea, P. Y., Rosly, R. N. R., & Omar, S. R. (2019). Integrated 21st century science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) education through robotics project-based learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7222
Khoiri, A., Evalina, Komariah, N., Utami, R. T., Paramarta, V., Siswandi, Janudin, & Sunarsi, D. (2021). 4Cs Analysis of 21st Century Skills-Based School Areas. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012142
Krisna, F. N. (2020). Higher Order Thinking Skills Learning Policy in K-2013: Economic and Political Perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 5(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v5i1.1513
Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
Lou, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Shih, R. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The senior high school students’ learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9112-x
Margorini, S., & Rini, R. Y. (2019). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Sains, Teknologi, Teknik Dan Matematika (STEM) Pada Anak Usia Dini: Kajian Literatur Terhadap Pandangan Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP, 2(1), 96–105.
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Olivier, E., Archambault, I., De Clercq, M., & Galand, B. (2019). Student Self-Efficacy, Classroom Engagement, and Academic Achievement: Comparing Three Theoretical Frameworks. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0952-0
Permanasari, A., Sariningrum, A., Rubini, B., & Ardianto, D. (2021). Improving Students’ Scientific Literacy Through Science Learning with Socio Scientific Issues (SSI). Proceedings of the 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020), 566(Aes 2020), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210715.068
Prayogi, R. D. (2020). Kecakapan Abad 21: Kompetensi Digital Pendidik Masa Depan. Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.23917/jmp.v14i2.9486
Rahman, R., Sopandi, W., Widya, R. N., & Yugafiati, R. (2019). Literacy in The Context of Communication Skills for The 21st Century Teacher Education in Primary School Students. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 3(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v3i1.32462
Sugiyono. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Toto, T., Yulisma, L., & Amam, A. (2021). Improving teachers’ understanding and readiness in implementing stem through science learning simulation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.27509
Widiawati, L., Joyoatmojo, S., & Sudiyanto. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skills as Effect of Problem Based Learning in the 21st Century Learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligous Understanding, 05(03), 96–105. http://ijmmu.com
Yokoyama, S. (2019). Academic self-efficacy and academic performance in Online Learning: A mini review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JAN), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02794
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM Literacy: STEM Literacy for Learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x
